<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dean Sas&#039;s Weblog &#187; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deansas.org/blog/tag/review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deansas.org/blog</link>
	<description>Tappity tap tap</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 08:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I.E. DOM Explorer</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2006/02/21/ie-dom-explorer/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2006/02/21/ie-dom-explorer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/archives/2006/02/21/ie-dom-explorer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While developing web pages at work, I&#8217;ve been struggling with using Javascript and the DOM to update elements via CSS. At home I&#8217;d just run various Firefox extensions and be able to track the problem down but at work I&#8217;m stuck with I.E. which has basically no developer friendly features. Scouring around the web for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While developing web pages at work, I&#8217;ve been struggling with using Javascript and the DOM to update elements via CSS. At home I&#8217;d just run various Firefox extensions and be able to track the problem down but at work I&#8217;m stuck with I.E. which has basically no developer friendly features. Scouring around the web for some javascript tricks that may be able to show me where I&#8217;m going wrong I stumbled upon Microsofts <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e59c3964-672d-4511-bb3e-2d5e1db91038&#038;displaylang=en">DOM Explorer beta</a>. </p>
<p>Suprisingly enough it strongly rivals Firefox for my needs, it has plenty of well-integrated functionality and could replace a few of the Firefox extensions I use.<br />
The tools that I principally used were: </p>
<ul>
<li>Stepping through the DOM as it is in memory, not as it was when the page loaded</li>
<li>Rapid experimentation with colours and styles</li>
<li>Finding out where an element belonged in the DOM simply by clicking on it</li>
<li>Flushing the cookies for the current domain only</li>
</ul>
<p>There were a couple of hiccups, sometimes the screen wouldn&#8217;t draw correctly where it had highlighted elements and such. The problems though, weren&#8217;t much compared to what you <emphasis>can</emphasis> get with Firefox. There the extensions often duplicated functionality, did it in differing ways and besides that there&#8217;s the maintenance hassle that upgrading Firefox entails.</p>
<p>Being Microsoft there was a lengthy EULA, one item in particular stood out.</p>
<blockquote><p>You may not work around any technical limitations in the software</p></blockquote>
<p>Technically doesn&#8217;t this stop me from viewing source and grokking the code myself if the tool doesn&#8217;t fit my needs?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to move away from <a href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/epiphany/">epiphany</a> for browsing or <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox">Firefox</a> for developing any time soon, but when you&#8217;re stuck with I.E. the DOM Explorer does a really good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2006/02/21/ie-dom-explorer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracks: Gettings Things Done</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2006/01/22/tracks-gettings-things-done/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2006/01/22/tracks-gettings-things-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/archives/2006/01/22/tracks-gettings-things-done</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the last fortnight or so I&#8217;ve been looking for a way to implement David Allens Getting Things Done time management methodologies. I&#8217;ve tried using it on my Pocket PC but it&#8217;s native todo system didn&#8217;t leave me satisfied with it, so I drifted away from the system. I was looking for something electronic which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last fortnight or so I&#8217;ve been looking for a way to implement <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0749922648">David Allens Getting Things Done</a> time management methodologies. I&#8217;ve tried using it on my Pocket PC but it&#8217;s native todo system didn&#8217;t leave me satisfied with it, so I drifted away from the system.</p>
<p>I was looking for something electronic which I could access from anywhere, so after browsing around different systems and how other people had done this. I decided to use <a href="http://www.rousette.org.uk/projects/">Tracks</a> to do it. It&#8217;s not perfect as it&#8217;s not available offline, but I can download the RSS feeds and can work with that offline, and print pages out otherwise.</p>
<p>Tracks has a few bugs in the latest released version, but I&#8217;ve downloaded the trunk version and it&#8217;s much improved, it has a lot of bugs fixed and some new features to ensure only your next actions are listed in your todo list.</p>
<p>There are a couple of things I&#8217;d like to see added in the short term &#8211; some kind of support for &#8220;someday/maybe&#8221; items and support for &#8220;people agendas&#8221;, longer term some 43 folders functionality would be nice.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s open source and written in Ruby on Rails, so hopefully it&#8217;ll give me more incentive to learn Ruby, so I can add this functionality. </p>
<p>Now if only I can find some calendar solution, I need to be able to publish it (and preferably edit it) online, and also be able to edit it with something that accesses evolution-data-server&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2006/01/22/tracks-gettings-things-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Thomas &amp; Rob Newman at The Lowry</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/12/11/mark-thomas-rob-newman-at-the-lowry/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/12/11/mark-thomas-rob-newman-at-the-lowry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I went to see Mark Thomas and Rob Newman at The Lowry. Mark Thomas is a comedian who gets his laughs by pointing out the stupid things others &#8211; frequently government, do. As well as being funny it&#8217;s also quite motivational. The main things he talked about on the night were war, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I went to see <a href="http://www.mtcp.co.uk/">Mark Thomas</a> and <a href="http://www.robnewman.com/master.html">Rob Newman</a> at <a href="http://www.thelowry.com/WhatsOn/EventDetail.aspx?EventId=2004">The Lowry</a>. </p>
<p>Mark Thomas is a comedian who gets his laughs by pointing out the stupid things others &#8211; frequently government, do. As well as being funny it&#8217;s also quite motivational.</p>
<p>The main things he talked about on the night were war, and arms dealing (he owns a German company called Guns &#8216;r&#8217; Us).  He got lots of laughter telling stories about his time at an arms fair. Despite being on the police watch list for the event and telling the organisers he&#8217;s writing a book about arms dealing, they gave him a pass and then commented how sneaky he was when he turned up&#8230;</p>
<p>He also told stories of the Hindujas, and how he&#8217;d got someone, secretly filmed, to admit their arms dealing connections, however when he came to Newsnight to run the story they said they&#8217;d have to ask the Hindujas for comments. The Hindujas comment came in the form of six lawyers. Newsnight did not run the story. Mark Thomas is now going to tell the story in the theatre across from the Hindujas estate, with a red carpet going from their front door, to the front door of the cinema. </p>
<p>The show was sort of like the bits of The Mark Thomas Product, where he tells you about the thing he&#8217;s done &#8211; only with no footage and things, but covering the multiple topics he&#8217;s interested in, such as the <a href="http://www.ecgd.gov.uk/">ECGD</a>, human rights. It seemed like a brief whirlwind of the things Thomas has got up too.</p>
<p>After the interval Rob Newman came on to perform his half of the show, now, besides knowing he and David Baddiel sold out Wembly Arena once upon a time, I knew exactly nothing about him. He came onto the stage, dressed in clothes that looked about 100 years old, wearing a bowler hat and doing a John Cleese style, funny walk. I didn&#8217;t know what to expect.</p>
<p>His routine mainly concerned the war, oil and random-ish odd songs with the occasional push of non-hierarchical autonomous groups. The routine was kind of light with humour, instead he tried to educate the audience on his theories. </p>
<p>Newman seems to me, to have a brain just full of facts, figures and thoughts. I&#8217;d imagine he&#8217;s a very interesting person to know.</p>
<p>The theories were quite controversial, and I&#8217;m unsure as to how serious he was about some of them, the main ones that come to mind is that &#8220;The first world war was all about oil in Iraq&#8221; and the prediction of a melt down in society over the next fifty years. </p>
<p>The melt down in society will apparently come through the lack of energy &#8211; oil production is apparently past it&#8217;s peak and the other sources won&#8217;t be able to provide  enough power quick enough to satisfy demand. One thing worth noting is that oil not only provides power for transport, but also for fertilisers and other things. Here&#8217;s more information on &#8220;<a href="http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/">Peak Oil</a>&#8220;. It&#8217;s quite an engrossing read.</p>
<p>But besides being a bit doom and gloom, he finished off his act on a lighter note, with some jokes and with songs singing accompanied by playing of the ukelele, including an impressive version of Rock Around the Clock in Arabic.</p>
<p>The show was finished with Thomas on the harmonica and Newman on the ukelele doing a seemingly improvised musical battle, where they took the chance to take the mick out of each other in song. Newman could obviously sing better, and was funnier, with Mark Thomas frequently stopping to laugh at him and what he looked like.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s still four tour dates left &#8211; in Warwick and Canterbury, but they&#8217;re very soon. If you get a chance to see these two then I&#8217;d definetly take it up. Not only will you have a great laugh, but you&#8217;ll also have chance to learn something.</p>
<p>Also thank you to the lady who gave me 10p for parking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/12/11/mark-thomas-rob-newman-at-the-lowry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flock</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/10/21/flock/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/10/21/flock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[p.u.c & p.u-uk.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/10/21/flock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve downloaded flock a firefox based web browser. It&#8217;s a basically reskinned firefox + some (well integrated) extensions. It aims to coexist with Firefox and not fork it, I suppose it&#8217;s vaguely similar to the ubuntu and debian relationship. The new features include: A blog poster (which I&#8217;m writing this from), which is really intuitive, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.flock.com/developer/">downloaded</a> <a href="http://www.flock.com">flock</a> a <a href="http://www.getfirefox.com/">firefox</a> based web browser. It&#8217;s a basically reskinned firefox + some (well integrated) extensions. It aims to coexist with Firefox and not fork it, I suppose it&#8217;s vaguely similar to the ubuntu and debian relationship.
 </p>
<p>The new features include:</p>
<ul>
<li>A blog poster (which I&#8217;m writing this from), which is really intuitive, simple and requires no user configuration but currently it&#8217;s really buggy, and not usuable for serious use.</li>
<li>Flickr integration including a new menu bar which shows pictures from flickr &#8211; this seems pretty useless to me.</li>
<li>Bookmarks being completely <a href="http://www.del.ico.us">del.ico.us</a> based &#8211; no persistant local storage, tagging etc. This could give me the push I need to use del.ico.us, it&#8217;s currently too much effort in firefox.</li>
<li>A pretty cool built in RSS reader that aggregates your RSS subscriptions, I&#8217;d use this instead of my current thunderbird RSS reader.</li>
<li>The &#8216;Shelf&#8217;, sort of a scrap book where you can collect interesting items and quickly include them in a blog post for example. Which is quite cool, and saves opening up notepad, or using lots of tabs.</li>
</ul>
<p>The CEO of Flock, Bart Decrem has said that he</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2005/tc2005105_2789_tc024.htm"><p>hopes to have 100 million users within five years.</p></blockquote>
<p class="citation"><cite cite="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2005/tc2005105_2789_tc024.htm"><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2005/tc2005105_2789_tc024.htm">Flock, the New Browser on the Block</a></cite></p>
<p>Which seems to me to be extremely ambitious as most of it&#8217;s advantages over firefox are stuff which don&#8217;t appeal to Joe Average &#8211; RSS, flickr and blogging. The kind of crowd that already know about firefox, opera, safari and others and those three probably barely have 100million<br />
between them.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see me using Flock as my main browser for a few reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>I can&#8217;t be bothered to import all the data that I have stored up in Firefox, and Flock offers no way of importing.</li>
<li>The blog editor is pretty much unusable.</li>
<li>I can&#8217;t see a way to search from the address bar like is possible by firefoxes &#8216;keyword&#8217; functionality</li>
</ul>
<p>It is only a 0.5 &#8220;developer&#8221; release and as such contains plenty of bugs. Particularly it seems with the blog poster.</p>
<p>I filed a bunch: <a href="http://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1345">1345</a>,<a href="http://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346">1346</a>, <a href="http://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347">1347</a>, <a href="http://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348">1348</a> and <a href="http://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349">1349</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/10/21/flock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holiday</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/10/16/holiday-2/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/10/16/holiday-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/10/16/holiday-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent the first part of this week, and all of last week on holiday in Bodrum, Turkey. I drove down to Sara&#8217;s dads near Southampton, with Sara and a whole lot of luggage on the Sunday, after a couple of misturns and half a tank of petrol we finally arrived. We promptly went to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent the first part of this week, and all of last week on holiday in Bodrum, Turkey. </p>
<p>I drove down to Sara&#8217;s dads near Southampton, with Sara and a whole lot of luggage on the Sunday, after a couple of misturns and half a tank of petrol we finally arrived. We promptly went to see her grandma in Fareham and then from there we went to eat in some nice pub that looked out over the south coast and the Isle of Weight. </p>
<p>Early Monday morning we drove up to Gatwick airport where I met Sara&#8217;s uncles for the first time, on the plane Sara let me have the window seat as I&#8217;m a first time flyer. It was quite cool flying over England, seeing the white cliffs of Dover and then flying over France, before climbing over the clouds &#8211; which made things quite boring until we started to descend once in Turkey. </p>
<p>Getting off of the plane I expected to be greeted by a wave of heat, luckily I wasn&#8217;t. It was hot but British Summertime hot.</p>
<p>Anyway the hotel (Club Belizie) was great, nice local food, very friendly staff and plenty of room &#8211; didn&#8217;t feel crammed in at all.</p>
<p>Food was served indoors with a wide range of Turkish warm food, fresh salads, breads, yoghurts and desserts and also outdoors on the barbeque. I ate plenty of kebap and plenty of peppered things &#8211; I now love stuffed peppers. I&#8217;ve bought a Turkish cookbook, not sure if I&#8217;ll ever actually use it, but it&#8217;s nice to think so.</p>
<p>There were also two restaurants, the Italian, which to be honest wasn&#8217;t that good (no lasagne for one thing); the Turkish, which was really good, nice food freshly cooked on the barbeque, great waiters. </p>
<p>Burgers, pizza and so on were also served in the mid afternoon. Though we didn&#8217;t realise this until the end of our stay.</p>
<p>There were a variety of bars inside the hotel and four pools, which we made use of.</p>
<p>The hotel was out on it&#8217;s own, away from Bodrum, however there was a mini-bus (dolmus) to the town centre that came outside the hotel every few minutes for 19 hours of the day and cost around 60p per person.</p>
<p>Went into Bodrum a few times, it seemed really chaotic &#8211; mopeds and Dolmus (Turkish minibuses) driving all over, all beeping their horns. It was however quite pleasant, it took a while getting used to the very demanding Turkish shopkeepers, insisting you come in their shop/cafe/pub and wanting to know why you didn&#8217;t want to and stuff. In the end we just decided we&#8217;d be ignorant foreigners and pay them no attention. There were plenty of designer knock-off goods around &#8211; Calvin Klein, Dolce + Gabanna and the like, didn&#8217;t buy any though.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t realise until the day before we left, but Bodrum was the place of one of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Wonders">seven wonders of the ancient world</a> &#8211; the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mausoleum_of_Maussollos">Mausoleum of Maussollos</a>. Didn&#8217;t have time to go to the castle which houses part of what&#8217;s left of the Mausoleum.</p>
<p>We did however see (from a distance) the <a href="http://www.guidebodrum.com/iassos.htm">ruins at Iassos</a> when we visited Sara&#8217;s Aunties and Uncles villa across the bay from there and also we drove past the <a href="http://www.guidebodrum.com/theatre.htm">theatre of ancient Halicarnassus</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/10/16/holiday-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confusion</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/09/27/confusion/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/09/27/confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/09/27/confusion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-other" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-image"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00029P9R8"><img alt="Product Image: Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 2 - Sith Lords" border="0" src="http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00029P9R8.02._PE32_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"/></a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00029P9R8">Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 2 - Sith Lords</a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>This game is basically more of <a href="http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/04/24/a-long-path/">the same</a>, but a bit more rough. The graphics are identical, the sounds are identical, the gameplay very similar. There's also some buggy elements around, nothing major, just things to jerk you out of being completely taken in. Yet despite all that, it still is addicting and a thoroughly great game.

The storyline is great, although there seemed to be a few unfinished bits, which took the gloss off of the game, this could've been because of various actions I took which didn't trigger them though. Some of the characters do seem a little flat though. The story continues on from the first, and you should probably play that first to make sure you're up on the lore of the game, however it's not a neccesity. Basically you're an ex-jedi who served under Revan in the Mandalorian Wars, you awaken in an unknown ship with another  force user. You then spend the rest of the game trying to find out why you are now an ex-jedi, and then tracking down the Sith Lords who believe that you are the last Jedi. Of course there's a couple of twists and turns upon the way.

The gameplay is much the same as the first one, <em>invisible</em> turn based combat between your party of three and hordes of Sith assasins and the like, sandwiched between puzzles and chatting, plus a few slight enhancements. One interesting aspect is the ability to influence the other characters - this causes their force alignment to follow yours and allows you to find out more about their background. The downside to this is that for the characters you don't influence there are lots of stubs and hints which you never get chance to take up, good excuse to play through again, but at about thirty hours to complete, not something which I'm likely to do.

I only wish that a third in the series was on the cards.</p></div>
</div>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-other" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-image"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00029P9R8"><img alt="Product Image: Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 2 - Sith Lords" border="0" src="http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00029P9R8.02._PE32_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"/></a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00029P9R8">Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 2 &#8211; Sith Lords</a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>This game is basically more of <a href="http://www.deansas.org/2005/04/24/a-long-path/">the same</a>, but a bit more rough. The graphics are identical, the sounds are identical, the gameplay very similar. There&#8217;s also some buggy elements around, nothing major, just things to jerk you out of being completely taken in. Yet despite all that, it still is addicting and a thoroughly great game.</p>
<p>The storyline is great, although there seemed to be a few unfinished bits, which took the gloss off of the game, this could&#8217;ve been because of various actions I took which didn&#8217;t trigger them though. Some of the characters do seem a little flat though. The story continues on from the first, and you should probably play that first to make sure you&#8217;re up on the lore of the game, however it&#8217;s not a neccesity. Basically you&#8217;re an ex-jedi who served under Revan in the Mandalorian Wars, you awaken in an unknown ship with another  force user. You then spend the rest of the game trying to find out why you are now an ex-jedi, and then tracking down the Sith Lords who believe that you are the last Jedi. Of course there&#8217;s a couple of twists and turns upon the way.</p>
<p>The gameplay is much the same as the first one, <em>invisible</em> turn based combat between your party of three and hordes of Sith assasins and the like, sandwiched between puzzles and chatting, plus a few slight enhancements. One interesting aspect is the ability to influence the other characters &#8211; this causes their force alignment to follow yours and allows you to find out more about their background. The downside to this is that for the characters you don&#8217;t influence there are lots of stubs and hints which you never get chance to take up, good excuse to play through again, but at about thirty hours to complete, not something which I&#8217;m likely to do.</p>
<p>I only wish that a third in the series was on the cards.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><script type="application/x-subnode; charset=utf-8">
<!-- the following is structured blog data for machine readers. -->
<subnode xmlns:data-view="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#" data-view:interpreter="http://structuredblogging.org/subnode-to-rdf-interpreter.xsl" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#subnode">
<xml -structured-blog-entry xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns">
	<generator id="wpsb-1" type="x-wpsb-simple-review" version="1"/>
	<simple -review version="1" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#simple-review">
		<review -title>Confusion</review>
		<review -type>Other</review></p>
<product -name>Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 2 - Sith Lords</product>
<product -link>http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00029P9R8</product>
<product -image-link>http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00029P9R8.02._PE32_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg</product>
		<description type="text/html" escaped="true">This game is basically more of &amp;lt;a href="http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/04/24/a-long-path/"&amp;gt;the same&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;, but a bit more rough. The graphics are identical, the sounds are identical, the gameplay very similar. There's also some buggy elements around, nothing major, just things to jerk you out of being completely taken in. Yet despite all that, it still is addicting and a thoroughly great game.</p>
<p>The storyline is great, although there seemed to be a few unfinished bits, which took the gloss off of the game, this could've been because of various actions I took which didn't trigger them though. Some of the characters do seem a little flat though. The story continues on from the first, and you should probably play that first to make sure you're up on the lore of the game, however it's not a neccesity. Basically you're an ex-jedi who served under Revan in the Mandalorian Wars, you awaken in an unknown ship with another  force user. You then spend the rest of the game trying to find out why you are now an ex-jedi, and then tracking down the Sith Lords who believe that you are the last Jedi. Of course there's a couple of twists and turns upon the way.</p>
<p>The gameplay is much the same as the first one, &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;invisible&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt; turn based combat between your party of three and hordes of Sith assasins and the like, sandwiched between puzzles and chatting, plus a few slight enhancements. One interesting aspect is the ability to influence the other characters - this causes their force alignment to follow yours and allows you to find out more about their background. The downside to this is that for the characters you don't influence there are lots of stubs and hints which you never get chance to take up, good excuse to play through again, but at about thirty hours to complete, not something which I'm likely to do.</p>
<p>I only wish that a third in the series was on the cards.</description>
	</simple>
</xml>
</subnode>
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/09/27/confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freakonomy</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/09/11/freakonomy/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/09/11/freakonomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/09/11/freakonomy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-book" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-image"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0713998067"><img alt="Product Image: Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the ..." border="0" src="http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0713998067.02._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"/></a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0713998067">Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the ...</a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>Freakonomics is a book wrote by "rogue economist" Stephen Levitt and writer Stephen J. Dubner. The book aims to explain why things took as conventional wisdom are wrong and other interesting questions such as "why do drug dealers live with their mothers" and why the way you bring up your kids doesn't matter. 

The book is very interesting and what's more, it's not wrote in <em>economese</em>, it's wrote in day to day accessible English, and doesn't require a Maths degree (or even a GCSE really) to understand.

 One annoying thing about this book is that at the start of every chapter there's some  "<em>Levitt is the best thing since sliced bread</em>", newspaper extract. Which really gets annoying - he's wrote one book and all the way through it he blows his own trumpet.

Ultimately though, the book, like this review is very short, weighing in at about two hundred big fonted pages.</p></div>
</div>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-book" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-image"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0713998067"><img alt="Product Image: Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the ..." border="0" src="http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0713998067.02._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"/></a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0713998067">Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the &#8230;</a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>Freakonomics is a book wrote by &#8220;rogue economist&#8221; Stephen Levitt and writer Stephen J. Dubner. The book aims to explain why things took as conventional wisdom are wrong and other interesting questions such as &#8220;why do drug dealers live with their mothers&#8221; and why the way you bring up your kids doesn&#8217;t matter. </p>
<p>The book is very interesting and what&#8217;s more, it&#8217;s not wrote in <em>economese</em>, it&#8217;s wrote in day to day accessible English, and doesn&#8217;t require a Maths degree (or even a GCSE really) to understand.</p>
<p> One annoying thing about this book is that at the start of every chapter there&#8217;s some  &#8220;<em>Levitt is the best thing since sliced bread</em>&#8220;, newspaper extract. Which really gets annoying &#8211; he&#8217;s wrote one book and all the way through it he blows his own trumpet.</p>
<p>Ultimately though, the book, like this review is very short, weighing in at about two hundred big fonted pages.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><script type="application/x-subnode; charset=utf-8">
<!-- the following is structured blog data for machine readers. -->
<subnode xmlns:data-view="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#" data-view:interpreter="http://structuredblogging.org/subnode-to-rdf-interpreter.xsl" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#subnode">
<xml-structured-blog-entry xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns">
	<generator id="wpsb-1" type="x-wpsb-simple-review" version="1"/>
	<simple-review version="1" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#simple-review">
		<review-title>Freakonomy</review-title>
		<review-type>Book</review-type></p>
<product-name>Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the ...</product-name>
<product-link>http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0713998067</product-link>
<product-image-link>http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0713998067.02._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg</product-image-link>
		<description type="text/html" escaped="true">Freakonomics is a book wrote by "rogue economist" Stephen Levitt and writer Stephen J. Dubner. The book aims to explain why things took as conventional wisdom are wrong and other interesting questions such as "why do drug dealers live with their mothers" and why the way you bring up your kids doesn't matter. </p>
<p>The book is very interesting and what's more, it's not wrote in &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;economese&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;, it's wrote in day to day accessible English, and doesn't require a Maths degree (or even a GCSE really) to understand.</p>
<p> One annoying thing about this book is that at the start of every chapter there's some  "&amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Levitt is the best thing since sliced bread&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;", newspaper extract. Which really gets annoying - he's wrote one book and all the way through it he blows his own trumpet.</p>
<p>Ultimately though, the book, like this review is very short, weighing in at about two hundred big fonted pages.</description>
	</simple-review>
</xml-structured-blog-entry>
</subnode>
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/09/11/freakonomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sterility</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/09/11/sterility/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/09/11/sterility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/09/11/sterility/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-movie" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-image"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/B0002IBJQE"><img alt="Product Image: THX: 1138" border="0" src="http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0002IBJQE.02._PE55_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"/></a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/B0002IBJQE">THX: 1138</a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>THX: 1138 is the full length version of an "arty" film George Lucas made as a student. It is something that's very different from the Star Wars and Indiana Jones films, it's very slow and sedate - basically to the point of being boring. 

The story is that of a 1984-style future. No sex allowed, no free thinking, everyone has to take government prescribed sedatives to keep them conforming. In this fascist future the lead character THX 1138 (Robert Duvall) awakens from his drug induced stupor and his feelings towards his flat-mate and to freedom begin to surface.

I expected this film to be redone and to have everything CGI-ified, however Lucas has pretty much kept this to a minimum, at least as far as I could see, having never saw the original. However there's not really much opportunity for it, the one place that I guess must've been redone is in the car chase scene and to my eyes at least, it was tastefully done.

Also for those Star Wars people, there's a few nods ahead to Lucas' future films, one quote in particular being "I ran over a wookie" and there's a C3PO style droid in there somewhere.

It was an ok-ish film, but just a bit too slow for my likings, and there was not much to see during the slow parts...</p></div>
</div>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-movie" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-image"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/B0002IBJQE"><img alt="Product Image: THX: 1138" border="0" src="http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0002IBJQE.02._PE55_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"/></a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/B0002IBJQE">THX: 1138</a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>THX: 1138 is the full length version of an &#8220;arty&#8221; film George Lucas made as a student. It is something that&#8217;s very different from the Star Wars and Indiana Jones films, it&#8217;s very slow and sedate &#8211; basically to the point of being boring. </p>
<p>The story is that of a 1984-style future. No sex allowed, no free thinking, everyone has to take government prescribed sedatives to keep them conforming. In this fascist future the lead character THX 1138 (Robert Duvall) awakens from his drug induced stupor and his feelings towards his flat-mate and to freedom begin to surface.</p>
<p>I expected this film to be redone and to have everything CGI-ified, however Lucas has pretty much kept this to a minimum, at least as far as I could see, having never saw the original. However there&#8217;s not really much opportunity for it, the one place that I guess must&#8217;ve been redone is in the car chase scene and to my eyes at least, it was tastefully done.</p>
<p>Also for those Star Wars people, there&#8217;s a few nods ahead to Lucas&#8217; future films, one quote in particular being &#8220;I ran over a wookie&#8221; and there&#8217;s a C3PO style droid in there somewhere.</p>
<p>It was an ok-ish film, but just a bit too slow for my likings, and there was not much to see during the slow parts&#8230;</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><script type="application/x-subnode; charset=utf-8">
<!-- the following is structured blog data for machine readers. -->
<subnode xmlns:data-view="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#" data-view:interpreter="http://structuredblogging.org/subnode-to-rdf-interpreter.xsl" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#subnode">
<xml-structured-blog-entry xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns">
	<generator id="wpsb-1" type="x-wpsb-simple-review" version="1"/>
	<simple-review version="1" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#simple-review">
		<review-title>Sterility</review-title>
		<review-type>Movie</review-type></p>
<product-name>THX: 1138</product-name>
<product-link>http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/B0002IBJQE</product-link>
<product-image-link>http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0002IBJQE.02._PE55_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg</product-image-link>
		<description type="text/html" escaped="true">THX: 1138 is the full length version of an "arty" film George Lucas made as a student. It is something that's very different from the Star Wars and Indiana Jones films, it's very slow and sedate - basically to the point of being boring. </p>
<p>The story is that of a 1984-style future. No sex allowed, no free thinking, everyone has to take government prescribed sedatives to keep them conforming. In this fascist future the lead character THX 1138 (Robert Duvall) awakens from his drug induced stupor and his feelings towards his flat-mate and to freedom begin to surface.</p>
<p>I expected this film to be redone and to have everything CGI-ified, however Lucas has pretty much kept this to a minimum, at least as far as I could see, having never saw the original. However there's not really much opportunity for it, the one place that I guess must've been redone is in the car chase scene and to my eyes at least, it was tastefully done.</p>
<p>Also for those Star Wars people, there's a few nods ahead to Lucas' future films, one quote in particular being "I ran over a wookie" and there's a C3PO style droid in there somewhere.</p>
<p>It was an ok-ish film, but just a bit too slow for my likings, and there was not much to see during the slow parts...</description>
	</simple-review>
</xml-structured-blog-entry>
</subnode>
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/09/11/sterility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Dud</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/08/11/digital-dud/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/08/11/digital-dud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/08/11/digital-dud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-book" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-image"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0552151696"><img alt="Product Image: Digital Fortress" border="0" src="http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0552151696.02._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"/></a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0552151696">Digital Fortress</a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>This is the third Dan Brown book I've read, the others being Angels and Demons and <a href="http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/03/12/the-da-vinci-code/trackback/">The Da Vinci Code</a>. It is also the worst. After reading the other two books I was left expecting something similar (fast action, loosely fact based)  but set in the worlds of maths and computers. What I actually got was the same book but set in the worlds of maths and computers. 

It seems like Brown has got a writers block somewhere along the line. Not to give too much away but this book, like the other two features a shadowy assasin, a strong male college professor lead, a beautiful and intelligant female lead and a seemingly trustworthy old man who turns out to be not as expected.

There were a fair few flaws from the technical side of things too - some of them big, some not, here's a few from the top of my head.  

The weakness of the NSAs operating system (presumably custom wrote to be fine tuned for brute forcing encrypted files) was also staggering, as soon as the "multi level firewall" was down people were in. 

The idea that the case on TRANSLTR (the NSAs supercomputer) was "welded shut" wasn't too clever either, NSA or not, they're going to get a hardware failure somewhere at some time or another...Especially as they seemingly used off-the-shelf components - the Digital Fortress file never needed recompiling.

Also the idea that TRANSLTR didn't need to know an encrypted files algorithm in order to unencrypt it. Uhm, it surely does need the algorithm for decrypting it, else how would it decrypt it?

A couple of another annoying things was that Brown apparently doesn't appreciate the difference between bit and byte, and the constant referring of X11 as x-eleven.

I know that it's fiction but at least getting the book proof read would've cleared up some of the more glaring errors.

Basically the book was ok-ish, if you're not into computers and haven't read any of Browns other books. Otherwise you're probably best off leaving alone, the other books were better written.</p></div>
</div>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-book" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-image"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0552151696"><img alt="Product Image: Digital Fortress" border="0" src="http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0552151696.02._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg"/></a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product"><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0552151696">Digital Fortress</a></div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>This is the third Dan Brown book I&#8217;ve read, the others being Angels and Demons and <a href="http://www.deansas.org/2005/03/12/the-da-vinci-code/trackback/">The Da Vinci Code</a>. It is also the worst. After reading the other two books I was left expecting something similar (fast action, loosely fact based)  but set in the worlds of maths and computers. What I actually got was the same book but set in the worlds of maths and computers. </p>
<p>It seems like Brown has got a writers block somewhere along the line. Not to give too much away but this book, like the other two features a shadowy assasin, a strong male college professor lead, a beautiful and intelligant female lead and a seemingly trustworthy old man who turns out to be not as expected.</p>
<p>There were a fair few flaws from the technical side of things too &#8211; some of them big, some not, here&#8217;s a few from the top of my head.  </p>
<p>The weakness of the NSAs operating system (presumably custom wrote to be fine tuned for brute forcing encrypted files) was also staggering, as soon as the &#8220;multi level firewall&#8221; was down people were in. </p>
<p>The idea that the case on TRANSLTR (the NSAs supercomputer) was &#8220;welded shut&#8221; wasn&#8217;t too clever either, NSA or not, they&#8217;re going to get a hardware failure somewhere at some time or another&#8230;Especially as they seemingly used off-the-shelf components &#8211; the Digital Fortress file never needed recompiling.</p>
<p>Also the idea that TRANSLTR didn&#8217;t need to know an encrypted files algorithm in order to unencrypt it. Uhm, it surely does need the algorithm for decrypting it, else how would it decrypt it?</p>
<p>A couple of another annoying things was that Brown apparently doesn&#8217;t appreciate the difference between bit and byte, and the constant referring of X11 as x-eleven.</p>
<p>I know that it&#8217;s fiction but at least getting the book proof read would&#8217;ve cleared up some of the more glaring errors.</p>
<p>Basically the book was ok-ish, if you&#8217;re not into computers and haven&#8217;t read any of Browns other books. Otherwise you&#8217;re probably best off leaving alone, the other books were better written.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><script type="application/x-subnode; charset=utf-8">
<!-- the following is structured blog data for machine readers. -->
<subnode xmlns:data-view="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#" data-view:interpreter="http://structuredblogging.org/subnode-to-rdf-interpreter.xsl" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#subnode">
<xml -structured-blog-entry xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns">
	<generator id="wpsb-1" type="x-wpsb-simple-review" version="1"/>
	<simple -review version="1" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#simple-review">
		<review -title>Digital Dud</review>
		<review -type>Book</review></p>
<product -name>Digital Fortress</product>
<product -link>http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=sasblog-21&#038;path=ASIN/0552151696</product>
<product -image-link>http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0552151696.02._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg</product>
		<description type="text/html" escaped="true">This is the third Dan Brown book I've read, the others being Angels and Demons and &amp;lt;a href="http://www.deansas.org/archives/2005/03/12/the-da-vinci-code/trackback/"&amp;gt;The Da Vinci Code&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;. It is also the worst. After reading the other two books I was left expecting something similar (fast action, loosely fact based)  but set in the worlds of maths and computers. What I actually got was the same book but set in the worlds of maths and computers. </p>
<p>It seems like Brown has got a writers block somewhere along the line. Not to give too much away but this book, like the other two features a shadowy assasin, a strong male college professor lead, a beautiful and intelligant female lead and a seemingly trustworthy old man who turns out to be not as expected.</p>
<p>There were a fair few flaws from the technical side of things too - some of them big, some not, here's a few from the top of my head.  </p>
<p>The weakness of the NSAs operating system (presumably custom wrote to be fine tuned for brute forcing encrypted files) was also staggering, as soon as the "multi level firewall" was down people were in. </p>
<p>The idea that the case on TRANSLTR (the NSAs supercomputer) was "welded shut" wasn't too clever either, NSA or not, they're going to get a hardware failure somewhere at some time or another...Especially as they seemingly used off-the-shelf components - the Digital Fortress file never needed recompiling.</p>
<p>Also the idea that TRANSLTR didn't need to know an encrypted files algorithm in order to unencrypt it. Uhm, it surely does need the algorithm for decrypting it, else how would it decrypt it?</p>
<p>A couple of another annoying things was that Brown apparently doesn't appreciate the difference between bit and byte, and the constant referring of X11 as x-eleven.</p>
<p>I know that it's fiction but at least getting the book proof read would've cleared up some of the more glaring errors.</p>
<p>Basically the book was ok-ish, if you're not into computers and haven't read any of Browns other books. Otherwise you're probably best off leaving alone, the other books were better written.</description>
	</simple>
</xml>
</subnode>
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/08/11/digital-dud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last of a series</title>
		<link>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/05/23/the-last-of-a-series/</link>
		<comments>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/05/23/the-last-of-a-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 18:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deansas.org/2005/05/23/the-last-of-a-series/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-movie" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product">Star Wars: Rise of the Sith</div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>Just got back from watching Star Wars 3: Rise of the Sith, and uhm yay and nay. The film itself was great, the lightsabre fights, Yoda, space battles, the effects etc etc. It pretty much all ties in nicely, wrapping up a few bugs in the story. The plot is essentially spot-on. There seems to be lots of references too, I think I saw the millenium falcon at one point and Chewie makes a cameo. Makes the other episodes all tie in a little more at any rate. 

The lightsabre battles are pretty much the best yet, they really manage to show the anger and power of Anakin. There's plenty of them too, with many different combatants. There's one thing that Lucas can direct and that's the lightsabre battles.  

The film really is the best of the prequels, it pretty much eclipses them. I feel I can't really measure it against the original trilogy though, to do that just feels wrong.

However, the same problems plague Sith as they did Menace and Clones. Again the dialogue is kinda weak in places, and a lot of the acting, Hayden Christensen feels ok taking money from this? Still it's improved from the other prequels.

Oh yeah, Jar Jar is only in for one brief moment and doesn't speak.</p></div>
</div>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="x-wpsb-review-movie" id="sbentry_">
<div class="x-wpsb-review-product">Star Wars: Rise of the Sith</div>
<div class="x-wpsb-review-description">
<p>Just got back from watching Star Wars 3: Rise of the Sith, and uhm yay and nay. The film itself was great, the lightsabre fights, Yoda, space battles, the effects etc etc. It pretty much all ties in nicely, wrapping up a few bugs in the story. The plot is essentially spot-on. There seems to be lots of references too, I think I saw the millenium falcon at one point and Chewie makes a cameo. Makes the other episodes all tie in a little more at any rate. </p>
<p>The lightsabre battles are pretty much the best yet, they really manage to show the anger and power of Anakin. There&#8217;s plenty of them too, with many different combatants. There&#8217;s one thing that Lucas can direct and that&#8217;s the lightsabre battles.  </p>
<p>The film really is the best of the prequels, it pretty much eclipses them. I feel I can&#8217;t really measure it against the original trilogy though, to do that just feels wrong.</p>
<p>However, the same problems plague Sith as they did Menace and Clones. Again the dialogue is kinda weak in places, and a lot of the acting, Hayden Christensen feels ok taking money from this? Still it&#8217;s improved from the other prequels.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, Jar Jar is only in for one brief moment and doesn&#8217;t speak.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><script type="application/x-subnode; charset=utf-8">
<!-- the following is structured blog data for machine readers. -->
<subnode xmlns:data-view="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#" data-view:interpreter="http://structuredblogging.org/subnode-to-rdf-interpreter.xsl" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#subnode">
<xml-structured-blog-entry xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns">
	<generator id="wpsb-1" type="x-wpsb-simple-review" version="1"/>
	<simple-review version="1" xmlns="http://www.structuredblogging.org/xmlns#simple-review">
		<review-title>The last of a series</review-title>
		<review-type>Movie</review-type></p>
<product-name>Star Wars: Rise of the Sith</product-name>
		<description type="text/html" escaped="true">Just got back from watching Star Wars 3: Rise of the Sith, and uhm yay and nay. The film itself was great, the lightsabre fights, Yoda, space battles, the effects etc etc. It pretty much all ties in nicely, wrapping up a few bugs in the story. The plot is essentially spot-on. There seems to be lots of references too, I think I saw the millenium falcon at one point and Chewie makes a cameo. Makes the other episodes all tie in a little more at any rate. </p>
<p>The lightsabre battles are pretty much the best yet, they really manage to show the anger and power of Anakin. There's plenty of them too, with many different combatants. There's one thing that Lucas can direct and that's the lightsabre battles.  </p>
<p>The film really is the best of the prequels, it pretty much eclipses them. I feel I can't really measure it against the original trilogy though, to do that just feels wrong.</p>
<p>However, the same problems plague Sith as they did Menace and Clones. Again the dialogue is kinda weak in places, and a lot of the acting, Hayden Christensen feels ok taking money from this? Still it's improved from the other prequels.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, Jar Jar is only in for one brief moment and doesn't speak.</description>
	</simple-review>
</xml-structured-blog-entry>
</subnode>
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deansas.org/blog/2005/05/23/the-last-of-a-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

